Victor Halabi is a fraudster and a crook who has faced multiple lawsuits because of his illegal activities.
Victor Halabi has been sued for fraud, breach of contract and several other serious crimes.
The following review takes a deeper look at the illegal operations of this fraudster and how his marketing team tried to hide them.
About Victor Halabi – What His Marketing Team Claims Him to Be
B&H Cellular Wholesale, situated in Brooklyn, New York, is run by Victor Halabi, who also serves as president and CEO. He is a seasoned businessman who has overseen numerous profitable projects. Victor has spent most of his time working in consumer electronics through his position at B&H Cellular, despite frequently working in importing and exporting. Victor Halabi and B&H Cellular have been assisting customers and consumers with their electronics needs for business and personal use for twenty years. They have experience working with a variety of premium brands. Still, they have focused particularly on serving as an Apple reseller, making sure to stay current with all launches, updates, and upgrades.
All products made by Apple, including the iPhone, iPad, and Mac Book, as well as those from other well-known manufacturers like Samsung, are sold through Victor Halabi and B&H Cellular.
B&H Cellular has expanded its range to include gaming equipment and electronic scooters. It has an attractive online collection of scooters, kids’ toys, and technological goods. It can offer unmatched quality and variety as well as competitive prices.
The foundation of B&H Cellular is first-rate customer support. It has the most affordable prices, provides excellent service, and is committed to addressing any problems with any transactions. Customers can shop with confidence on its website because it guarantees a secure purchasing experience. Customers who shop on the B&H Cellular website benefit from a variety of online payment options, 24/7 customer care via phone or live chat, year-round special offers, free returns within the United States and Canada, and free delivery inside the United States and Canada.
Victor Halabi: Accuse of Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Fraud
Ming Kwan filed a case in the Supreme Court of The State of New York against Victor Halabi, CEO of B&H Cellular. He was charged with Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Fraud.
What is a Breach of contract?
A breach of a binding contract is when one of the stipulated terms and conditions is broken. Anything from a late payment to a more significant infraction, like failing to deliver a promised asset, could constitute a breach. A contract is enforceable in court and has legal force. Giving the victim what they were initially promised is usually the remedy when a contract has been proven to have been broken. Punitive damages are rarely granted for failure to fulfill contractual commitments, and a breach of contract is not regarded as a crime or even a tort.
When one party violates the conditions of a deal among two or more parties, it is considered a breach of contract. This covers situations where a contractual duty is breached, such as when you are late with a rent payment or when a tenant vacates their unit without paying six months’ worth of back rent.
The procedure for handling a breach of contract may occasionally be spelled out in the original agreement. A contract might, for instance, include that, in the event of late payment, the offender must also pay a $25 fee.
What is Unjust Enrichment?
Unjust enrichment in equity laws refers to when one person gains wealth at the expense of another under conditions that the law deems unfair. The recipient of an unjustly obtained benefit is required by law to make restitution, subject to defenses like the change of position. Regardless of whether the beneficiary committed a crime, someone might still be held accountable for an unjust (or unjustifiable) enrichment. Roman law is where the phrase “no one shall profit at another’s expense” (nemo locupletari potest aliena iactura or nemo locupletari debet cum aliena iactura) first appeared.
Although they are not identical, the law of restitution and the law of unjust enrichment are closely related. The law of gain-based recovery is the law of restitution. That goes beyond the prohibition against unjust enrichment. Similar to how compensation for breach of contract is a subset of the law dealing with compensation, restitution for unjust enrichment is a subset of the law of restitution. Unjust enrichment should not be confused with illegal enrichment, a legal term that refers to a person’s enjoying of wealth that is not justified by their legal income.
What is a Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing?
The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, or “good faith and fair dealing,” is a general presumption in contract law that the parties to a contract will deal with one another honestly, fairly, and in good faith so as not to impair the right of the other party or parties to benefit from the contract. In many different forms of contracts, it is inferred to support any written covenants or promises made in the contract.
When one party to the contract tries to use a technical justification for breaching the agreement, or when that party uses specific contractual terms alone to refuse to perform his or her contractual obligations, despite the general circumstances and understandings between the parties, a lawsuit (or cause of action) based on the breach of the covenant may result. Every written agreement has an “implied promise of good faith and fair conduct,” which courts and other fact-finders must consider when interpreting it.
What is a Fraud? (One of the Many Alleged Crimes of Victor Halabi)
Fraud is an intentionally deceptive action designed to provide the perpetrator with an unlawful gain or to deny a right to a victim. Types of fraud include tax fraud, credit card fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and bankruptcy fraud. Fraudulent activity can be carried out by one individual, multiple individuals or a business firm as a whole. False statements about the facts are a component of fraud, whether they are made to another party with the intent to deceive or purposefully withheld for the goal of obtaining something that might not have been given otherwise.
The fraudster frequently knows knowledge that the intended victim does not, which allows the fraudster to fool the victim. Fundamentally, the person or business engaging in fraud is profiting from information asymmetry, notably from the fact that it can be expensive to check and verify information, making it less likely that efforts will be made to avoid fraud.
Reviews About B&H Cellular
Victor Halabi CEO of B&H Cellular. He was charged with Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Fraud. Ming Kwan filed a case in the Supreme Court of The State of New York against Victor Halabi.
The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source RepDigger.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘Scam Tracers,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.
This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from RepDigger.com.
To view the original article at RepDigger.com, you can visit https://repdigger.com/reviews/victor-halabi/.
Leave a Reply